Polywater: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>George Swan (first draft) |
imported>George Swan (add reference) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| author=Phil Attard | | author=Phil Attard | ||
| date= | | date= | ||
| accessdate=2008-06-25 | |||
| quote= | |||
}}</ref><ref name=Bjps1991> | |||
{{cite paper | |||
| url=http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/citation/42/3/295 | |||
| title=Discussion: Polywater and Experimental Realism | |||
| page= | |||
| pages=295-307 | |||
| publisher=[[British Journal for the Philosophy of Science]] | |||
| issue=3 | |||
| volume=42 | |||
| author=[[William J. McKinney]] | |||
| date=1991 | |||
| accessdate=2008-06-25 | |||
| quote= | |||
}}</ref><ref name=Bjps1993> | |||
{{cite news | |||
| url=http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/citation/42/3/295 | |||
| title=Discussion: Polywater and Experimental Realism | |||
| page= | |||
| pages=775-784 | |||
| author=[[J. Van Brakel]] | |||
| publisher=[[British Journal for the Philosophy of Science]] | |||
| volume=44 | |||
| date=1994 | |||
| accessdate=2008-06-25 | | accessdate=2008-06-25 | ||
| quote= | | quote= | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Poly water was said to be a kind or ordered liquid water, formed in very thin capillary tubes. | |||
Research grants requests were written.<ref name=PhilAttardPolywater/> Studies were conducted. In the end it turned out that the anomalous properties were due to impurities in the tubes -- not due to the discovery of a new form of liquid water. | Research grants requests were written.<ref name=PhilAttardPolywater/> Studies were conducted. In the end it turned out that the anomalous properties were due to impurities in the tubes -- not due to the discovery of a new form of liquid water. | ||
Revision as of 15:06, 25 June 2008
In the 1960s claims were made that scientific studies had confirmed an hither-to unknown phase of water, called polywater.[1][2][3] Poly water was said to be a kind or ordered liquid water, formed in very thin capillary tubes.
Research grants requests were written.[1] Studies were conducted. In the end it turned out that the anomalous properties were due to impurities in the tubes -- not due to the discovery of a new form of liquid water.
Like N-Rays, polywater is cited as a warning against scientific hubris.[1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Phil Attard. What is polywater?, University of Sydney. Retrieved on 2008-06-25.
- ↑ William J. McKinney (1991). Discussion: Polywater and Experimental Realism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Retrieved on 2008-06-25.
- ↑ J. Van Brakel. Discussion: Polywater and Experimental Realism, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1994, pp. 775-784. Retrieved on 2008-06-25.