Pseudoscience/External Links: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
* [http://www.skeptic.com/ The Skeptics Society and ''Skeptic'' magazine(US)]
* [http://www.skeptic.com/ The Skeptics Society and ''Skeptic'' magazine(US)]
* [http://www.skeptic.org.uk/ ''The Skeptic'' magazine (UK)]
* [http://www.skeptic.org.uk/ ''The Skeptic'' magazine (UK)]
* [http://www.csicop.org/ Committee for Skeptical Inquiry]
* [http://www.csicop.org/ Committee for Skeptical Inquiry] The Committee "encourages the critical investigation of paranormal and fringe-science claims from a responsible, scientific point of view and disseminates factual information about the results of such inquiries to the scientific community and the public."
* [http://www.csicop.org/si/ ''Skeptical Inquirer'' magazine]
* [http://www.csicop.org/si/ ''Skeptical Inquirer'' magazine]
* [http://www.ufoskeptic.org/ UFO skeptic site "by and for professional scientists"]
* [http://www.ufoskeptic.org/ UFO skeptic site "by and for professional scientists"]

Revision as of 12:49, 29 November 2007

There are many websites set up to air skeptical opinions particularly concerning claims for the effectiveness of remedies or treatments for a wide range of medical conditions which are not endorsed by conventional medicine, and to criticise unconventional "fringe" theories that are not generally accepted. The standard of these sites (and the standards of arguments within them) vary considerably, and it would be a mistake to assume that these always present the fringe theories fairly, or the scientific arguments (for or against) rigorously. Among these sites are: