Research peer review/External Links: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(+one)
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(+one)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
*In [http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/three-myths-about-scientific-peer-review/ Three myths about scientific peer review], Michael Nielsen discusses three common assumptions about peer review, namely that it:
*In [http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/three-myths-about-scientific-peer-review/ Three myths about scientific peer review], [[Michael Nielsen]] discusses three common assumptions about peer review, namely that it:
:#has always been there
:#has always been there
:#is reliable
:#is reliable
Line 6: Line 6:


*[http://www.rin.ac.uk/resources/rin-publications/policy-and-guidance/peer-review-guide Peer review: a guide for researchers] — a practical guide, compiled by the [[Research Information Network]]
*[http://www.rin.ac.uk/resources/rin-publications/policy-and-guidance/peer-review-guide Peer review: a guide for researchers] — a practical guide, compiled by the [[Research Information Network]]
*[http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/57601/ I Hate Your Paper] — a perspective in [[The Scientist]] about broken aspects of the system, and some suggested fixes

Latest revision as of 19:48, 7 August 2010

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Audio [?]
Video [?]
 
A hand-picked, annotated list of Web resources about Research peer review.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner and consider archiving the URLs behind the links you provide. See also related web sources.
  1. has always been there
  2. is reliable
  3. is the way to determine truth in science