Satellite communications: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "U.S. Navy" to "United States Navy")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
'''Satellite communications''' include a wide range of technologies and applications that principally depend on the use of artificial satellites in [[satellite orbits|Earth orbit]]. The article is not titled "communications satellite", since many applications involve multiple orbiting vehicles, and also a great deal of equipment on Earth. The definition is sufficiently broad to include communications that use communications relay devices operating within the atmosphere, including [[unmanned aerial vehicle]]s, lighter-than-air devices carrying electronics, or manned aircraft with a primary communications relay function.
{{TOC|right}}
'''Satellite communications''' include a wide range of technologies and applications that depend on high-altitude electronic relay(s), most often artificial satellites in [[satellite orbits|Earth orbit]]. The article is not titled "communications satellite", since many applications involve multiple orbiting vehicles, and also a great deal of equipment on Earth. The definition is sufficiently broad to include communications that use communications relay devices operating within the atmosphere, including [[unmanned aerial vehicle]]s, lighter-than-air devices carrying electronics, or manned aircraft with a primary communications relay function.
==Operating frequency tradeoffs==
===UHF satellites===
Satellites operating in the [[ITU Frequency Bands|Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)]] offer the advantage of simple receivers and antennas, with plausible connectivity between the satellite and a handheld or other [[portable]] receiver. The disadvantage is that such communications rarely support high data rates, but that is perfectly acceptable in some applications, where short messages are meaningful. Civilian examples include [[Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon]]s (EPIRB), which send short distress messages to the [[COSPAS-SARSAT]] constellations.
 
Military communications involving primarily text messaging or low-speed facsimile also work well with UHF, not needing complex antennas. Examples include the early [[United States Navy]] FLTSATCOM, followed by the current [[UHF Follow-On (satellite)|UHF Follow-On (UFO)]] system, which, in turn, will be succeeded by the [[Mobile User Objective System (satellite)|Mobile User Objective System]].  For their particular operating environment, the military can afford additional signal processing that provides more bandwidth, but even they will operate in other frequency ranges when high data rates are needed.
==Orbital tradeoffs==
==Advanced features==

Latest revision as of 10:05, 10 February 2023

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Satellite communications include a wide range of technologies and applications that depend on high-altitude electronic relay(s), most often artificial satellites in Earth orbit. The article is not titled "communications satellite", since many applications involve multiple orbiting vehicles, and also a great deal of equipment on Earth. The definition is sufficiently broad to include communications that use communications relay devices operating within the atmosphere, including unmanned aerial vehicles, lighter-than-air devices carrying electronics, or manned aircraft with a primary communications relay function.

Operating frequency tradeoffs

UHF satellites

Satellites operating in the Ultra-High Frequency (UHF) offer the advantage of simple receivers and antennas, with plausible connectivity between the satellite and a handheld or other portable receiver. The disadvantage is that such communications rarely support high data rates, but that is perfectly acceptable in some applications, where short messages are meaningful. Civilian examples include Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB), which send short distress messages to the COSPAS-SARSAT constellations.

Military communications involving primarily text messaging or low-speed facsimile also work well with UHF, not needing complex antennas. Examples include the early United States Navy FLTSATCOM, followed by the current UHF Follow-On (UFO) system, which, in turn, will be succeeded by the Mobile User Objective System. For their particular operating environment, the military can afford additional signal processing that provides more bandwidth, but even they will operate in other frequency ranges when high data rates are needed.

Orbital tradeoffs

Advanced features