Set theory/Related Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Milton Beychok m (→Bot-suggested topics: Revised a wiki link) |
imported>Peter Schmitt (replacing bot generated list) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Parent topics== | ==Parent topics== | ||
{{r|Mathematics}} | |||
{{r|Mathematical logic}} | |||
{{r|Naive set theory}} | |||
{{r|Axiom system}} | |||
{{r|Axiomatic set theory}} | |||
==Subtopics== | ==Subtopics== | ||
{{r|Set (mathematics)}} | |||
{{r|Power set}} | |||
{{r|Cardinality}} | |||
{{r|Axiom of choice}} | |||
==Other related topics== | ==Other related topics== | ||
{{r|Georg Cantor}} | |||
{{r| | |||
{{r|Bertrand Russell}} | {{r|Bertrand Russell}} | ||
{{r|Kurt Gödel}} | {{r|Kurt Gödel}} | ||
Revision as of 08:48, 25 May 2010
- See also changes related to Set theory, or pages that link to Set theory or to this page or whose text contains "Set theory".
Parent topics
- Mathematics [r]: The study of quantities, structures, their relations, and changes thereof. [e]
- Mathematical logic [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Naive set theory [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Axiom system [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Axiomatic set theory [r]: Add brief definition or description
Subtopics
- Set (mathematics) [r]: Informally, any collection of distinct elements. [e]
- Power set [r]: The set of all subsets of a given set. [e]
- Cardinality [r]: The size, i.e., the number of elements, of a (possibly infinite) set. [e]
- Axiom of choice [r]: Set theory assertion that if S is a set of disjoint, non-empty sets, then there exists a set containing exactly one member from each member of S. [e]
- Georg Cantor [r]: (1845-1918) Danish-German mathematician who introduced set theory and the concept of transcendental numbers [e]
- Bertrand Russell [r]: (1872–1970) British analytic philosopher, logician, essayist and political activist. [e]
- Kurt Gödel [r]: (1906-1978) Austrian born American mathematician, most famous for proving that in any logical system rich enough to describe naturals, there are always statements that are true but impossible to prove within the system. [e]