Sunspot cycle: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ed Poor (MM was not as long as the LIA) |
imported>Ed Poor (another ref for 11-year cycle) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''sunspot cycle''' is a periodic variation in the number of [[sunspots]]. Since 1755, 23 of these have been observed with an average length of 11 years.<ref>"The number of sunspots reaches a maximum about every 11 years ..." [http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~soper/Sun/cycle.html Davison E. Soper, Institute of Theoretical Science, University of Oregon]</ref> A period of time when there are few sunspots is called a ''solar minimum''. The longest one was the [[Maunder Minimum]], and it corresponded with the start of the [[Little Ice Age]] (1650 to 1850).<ref name=SantaFe>"That period also correlates with the [[Little Ice Age]], which started in 1650 and ended in the mid-1800s." [http://www.santafenewmexican.com/HealthandScience/A-quiet-sun Low sunspot cycle fascinates scientists, who say there's no reason to panic] - Santa Fe New Mexican</ref> | The '''sunspot cycle''' is a periodic variation in the number of [[sunspots]]. Since 1755, 23 of these have been observed with an average length of 11 years.<ref>"The number of sunspots reaches a maximum about every 11 years ..." [http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~soper/Sun/cycle.html Davison E. Soper, Institute of Theoretical Science, University of Oregon]</ref><ref>"... the number of sunspots visible on the sun waxes and wanes with an approximate 11-year cycle." [http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/SunspotCycle.shtml NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center]</ref> | ||
A period of time when there are few sunspots is called a ''solar minimum''. The longest one was the [[Maunder Minimum]], and it corresponded with the start of the [[Little Ice Age]] (1650 to 1850).<ref name=SantaFe>"That period also correlates with the [[Little Ice Age]], which started in 1650 and ended in the mid-1800s." [http://www.santafenewmexican.com/HealthandScience/A-quiet-sun Low sunspot cycle fascinates scientists, who say there's no reason to panic] - Santa Fe New Mexican</ref> | |||
Sunspot cycles are important, because of their link to [[climate change]] on the earth. When there are few sunspots, the earth tends to get cooler, and vice versa. This may be the main driver of [[global warming]] and cooling. | Sunspot cycles are important, because of their link to [[climate change]] on the earth. When there are few sunspots, the earth tends to get cooler, and vice versa. This may be the main driver of [[global warming]] and cooling. | ||
Revision as of 14:13, 15 April 2010
The sunspot cycle is a periodic variation in the number of sunspots. Since 1755, 23 of these have been observed with an average length of 11 years.[1][2] A period of time when there are few sunspots is called a solar minimum. The longest one was the Maunder Minimum, and it corresponded with the start of the Little Ice Age (1650 to 1850).[3]
Sunspot cycles are important, because of their link to climate change on the earth. When there are few sunspots, the earth tends to get cooler, and vice versa. This may be the main driver of global warming and cooling.
- ...there is some evidence that a lack of sunspots can cause moderate cooling because of the way the sun interacts with Earth's outer atmosphere, said Alexei Pevtsov, staff astronomer at the National Solar Observatory in Sunspot, N.M.[3]
Notes
- ↑ "The number of sunspots reaches a maximum about every 11 years ..." Davison E. Soper, Institute of Theoretical Science, University of Oregon
- ↑ "... the number of sunspots visible on the sun waxes and wanes with an approximate 11-year cycle." NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 "That period also correlates with the Little Ice Age, which started in 1650 and ended in the mid-1800s." Low sunspot cycle fascinates scientists, who say there's no reason to panic - Santa Fe New Mexican
Links
- Are sunspots to blame for climate change? - Paul MacRae, May 31, 2008