Talk:Ann Coulter: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Louis F. Sander
No edit summary
imported>Louis F. Sander
(Add Article Checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Coulter, Ann
|                cat1 = Journalism
|                cat2 = Literature
|                cat3 = Media
|          cat_check =
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = yes
|            cleanup =
|                  by = [[User:Louis F. Sander|Louis F. Sander]] 19:48, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
}}
I imported this from Wikipedia, with the intention of making it into a decent encyclopedia article about a controversial personality. IMHO, the Wikipedia version is a very bad article that places far too much emphasis on negatives, controversies, and the like. [[User:Louis F. Sander|Louis F. Sander]] 22:33, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
I imported this from Wikipedia, with the intention of making it into a decent encyclopedia article about a controversial personality. IMHO, the Wikipedia version is a very bad article that places far too much emphasis on negatives, controversies, and the like. [[User:Louis F. Sander|Louis F. Sander]] 22:33, 28 March 2007 (CDT)



Revision as of 19:48, 8 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Ann Coulter"
Workgroup category or categories Journalism Workgroup, Literature Workgroup, Media Workgroup [Please add or review categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Louis F. Sander 19:48, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





I imported this from Wikipedia, with the intention of making it into a decent encyclopedia article about a controversial personality. IMHO, the Wikipedia version is a very bad article that places far too much emphasis on negatives, controversies, and the like. Louis F. Sander 22:33, 28 March 2007 (CDT)

I would start over, putting this on (say) Talk:Ann Coulter/WP, picking and choosing what to use. It's a mess right now. --Larry Sanger 23:12, 28 March 2007 (CDT)

Do you mean I should put it in some sort of "work in progress" area, where it can't be readily seen until it's finished? I'm going to work on it, and I already have, but it needs a LOT of work. I've discovered that the work goes fairly slowly, too, especially due to some pretty convoluted and hard-to-get citations. Louis F. Sander 00:39, 29 March 2007 (CDT)