Talk:Baldwin effect: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(→‎Title: new section)
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(response to Howard)
Line 4: Line 4:


Far be it from me to be at title purist, but wouldn't "Baldwin Effect" be more in keeping with convention? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 19:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Far be it from me to be at title purist, but wouldn't "Baldwin Effect" be more in keeping with convention? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 19:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
:Not too far, though. I anticipated comments.
:The Baldwin Effect is almost always referred to as "The Baldwin Effect"; try Google Scholar, for example.  Examples:
The Baldwin Effect: A Matter of Perspective
Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered
Bruce H. Weber and David J. Depew, eds
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003
(341 pp; $50.00 hbk; ISBN 0-262-23229-4)
The Baldwin Effect
George Gaylord Simpson
Evolution, VoL 7, No.2. (Jun., 1953), pp. 110-117.
Indeed, now that you bring it up, I think the title should read "The Baldwin Effect" instead of "The Baldwin effect". How would I go about doing that, exactly.
<br><hr>

Revision as of 15:20, 15 December 2010

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Evolutionary process whereby a facile ability to learn something advantageous to an individual's fitness becomes, over a variable number of generations, genetically encoded in the gene pool of a species. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Biology and History [Categories OK]
 Subgroup categories:  Evolutionary Biology and History of Biology
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Title

Far be it from me to be at title purist, but wouldn't "Baldwin Effect" be more in keeping with convention? Howard C. Berkowitz 19:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Not too far, though. I anticipated comments.
The Baldwin Effect is almost always referred to as "The Baldwin Effect"; try Google Scholar, for example. Examples:

The Baldwin Effect: A Matter of Perspective Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered Bruce H. Weber and David J. Depew, eds Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003 (341 pp; $50.00 hbk; ISBN 0-262-23229-4)

The Baldwin Effect George Gaylord Simpson Evolution, VoL 7, No.2. (Jun., 1953), pp. 110-117.

Indeed, now that you bring it up, I think the title should read "The Baldwin Effect" instead of "The Baldwin effect". How would I go about doing that, exactly.