Talk:Central dogma of molecular genetics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Christopher M. Worsham
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Central dogma, the
|                cat1 = Biology
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 22:05, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
}}


Is the hypothesis ''now'' generally referred to as "the central dogma" or is the name itself merely a bit of historical trivia?  Also, is the term usually capitalized, The Central Dogma (as in the text of this article)?  If so, then the article needs to be moved (click on "move") to [[The Central Dogma]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:36, 28 January 2007 (CST)
Is the hypothesis ''now'' generally referred to as "the central dogma" or is the name itself merely a bit of historical trivia?  Also, is the term usually capitalized, The Central Dogma (as in the text of this article)?  If so, then the article needs to be moved (click on "move") to [[The Central Dogma]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:36, 28 January 2007 (CST)


The phrase comes up so much in current biology that the article is not just trivia, it will hellp many people understand the introductory text in various molecular biology and cell biolgy (and other) articles. I'm not sure, but I think it should be formatted in a title case.I'm not sure enough to move it, though. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 09:40, 28 January 2007 (CST)
The phrase comes up so much in current biology that the article is not just trivia, it will hellp many people understand the introductory text in various molecular biology and cell biolgy (and other) articles. I'm not sure, but I think it should be formatted in a title case.I'm not sure enough to move it, though. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 09:40, 28 January 2007 (CST)

Latest revision as of 04:53, 26 September 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Assumption of molecular biology, namely, that each gene in the DNA molecule carries the information needed to construct one protein, which, acting as an enzyme, controls one chemical reaction in the cell. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Biology [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Is the hypothesis now generally referred to as "the central dogma" or is the name itself merely a bit of historical trivia? Also, is the term usually capitalized, The Central Dogma (as in the text of this article)? If so, then the article needs to be moved (click on "move") to The Central Dogma. --Larry Sanger 09:36, 28 January 2007 (CST)

The phrase comes up so much in current biology that the article is not just trivia, it will hellp many people understand the introductory text in various molecular biology and cell biolgy (and other) articles. I'm not sure, but I think it should be formatted in a title case.I'm not sure enough to move it, though. Nancy Sculerati MD 09:40, 28 January 2007 (CST)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Central_dogma_of_molecular_genetics&oldid=13367"