Talk:Clebsch-Gordan coefficients: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
(→‎Confusement: new section)
imported>Jitse Niesen
(notation of eigenstates)
Line 6: Line 6:


In the original WP text the ''i'' in ''j''<sub> ''i''</sub> could stand for ''x'', ''y'', or ''z'', or for "particle number" 1 or 2. In some situations this was confusing, so I introduced ''x'', ''y'' and ''z''.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 07:32, 7 October 2007 (CDT)
In the original WP text the ''i'' in ''j''<sub> ''i''</sub> could stand for ''x'', ''y'', or ''z'', or for "particle number" 1 or 2. In some situations this was confusing, so I introduced ''x'', ''y'' and ''z''.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 07:32, 7 October 2007 (CDT)
== Notation of eigenstates ==
Is there a difference between the states <math>|(j_1j_2)JM\rangle</math> and <math>|JM\rangle</math>? I guess not, because the latter notation appears in the orthogonality relation
:<math>
  \langle J M | J' M' \rangle = \delta_{J\, J'}\delta_{M\,M'}
</math>
without any comment. I find it rather confusing that both notations appear in the definition
:<math>
  |(j_1j_2)JM\rangle = \sum_{m_1=-j_1}^{j_1} \sum_{m_2=-j_2}^{j_2}
  |j_1m_1\rangle|j_2m_2\rangle \langle j_1m_1j_2m_2|JM\rangle
</math>
for the CG coeffs. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 06:37, 30 July 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 06:37, 30 July 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition appear in total angular momentum eigenstates when written in terms of angular momentum states of subsystems. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories physics and mathematics [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

From Wikipedia, I changed the lead, added equation for explicit expression (plus discussion) and one special case.--Paul Wormer 03:45, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

Confusement

In the original WP text the i in j i could stand for x, y, or z, or for "particle number" 1 or 2. In some situations this was confusing, so I introduced x, y and z.--Paul Wormer 07:32, 7 October 2007 (CDT)

Notation of eigenstates

Is there a difference between the states and ? I guess not, because the latter notation appears in the orthogonality relation

without any comment. I find it rather confusing that both notations appear in the definition

for the CG coeffs. -- Jitse Niesen 06:37, 30 July 2008 (CDT)