Talk:Discounted cash flow: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
I suggest including the reasons for the superiority of the NPV method over the DCF method, and including the concept of net present expected value. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 04:22, 5 December 2007 (CST) | I suggest including the reasons for the superiority of the NPV method over the DCF method, and including the concept of net present expected value. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 04:22, 5 December 2007 (CST) | ||
On further reflection, I consider there is so much confusion in this article between the dcf and npv criteria for investment appraisal that it requires a complete rewrite with proper links to the articles on net present value and discount rate and the elimination of repetitions and inconsistencies with those articles. If nobody else wants to tackle it, I will put it on my to-do list.[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 16:30, 25 February 2008 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:30, 25 February 2008
I suggest including the reasons for the superiority of the NPV method over the DCF method, and including the concept of net present expected value. Nick Gardner 04:22, 5 December 2007 (CST)
On further reflection, I consider there is so much confusion in this article between the dcf and npv criteria for investment appraisal that it requires a complete rewrite with proper links to the articles on net present value and discount rate and the elimination of repetitions and inconsistencies with those articles. If nobody else wants to tackle it, I will put it on my to-do list.Nick Gardner 16:30, 25 February 2008 (CST)