Talk:Fertility (demography)/Draft

From Citizendium
< Talk:Fertility (demography)
Revision as of 18:49, 8 October 2007 by imported>D. Matt Innis (→‎APPROVED Version 1.0: content)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The demographic analysis of having babies. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Health Sciences [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Article title

Do we need to disambiguate this article by including 'demography' in the title. Could it not live at fertility? Derek Harkness 09:04, 27 June 2007 (CDT)

This article is entirely about the demographic aspects of fertility (with zero on biology or medicine or topics like infertility remedies.) Richard Jensen 00:59, 28 June 2007 (CDT)

APPROVED Version 1.0

This article really should exist at fertility (demography) or else fertility (demographics). The current titling is contrary to policy, idiosyncratic, and completely confusing. --Larry Sanger 18:22, 8 October 2007 (CDT)

Yes, this escaped my attention. Obviously the article is about fertility, so that should be the lead word. With demography in brackets. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 18:29, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
I think Richard addressed that above. --Matt Innis (Talk) 18:37, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
I don't see how, Matt. He just said that the article concerns the demographic aspects of fertility. Thus the word "demography" or "demographics" (don't ask me which is correct) in parentheses. I agree it shouldn't live at fertility. --Larry Sanger 18:44, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
LOL, don't shoot the messenger ;-) Matt Innis (Talk) 18:49, 8 October 2007 (CDT)