Talk:Health consequences of obesity: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gareth Leng
mNo edit summary
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


Any news form Hannah? [[User:Celine Caquineau|Celine Caquineau]] 09:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Any news form Hannah? [[User:Celine Caquineau|Celine Caquineau]] 09:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Lowri asked me "Should I be aiming to discuss specific experiments and how they have contributed to what we know?"
I answeresd "For an encyclopedia article, it's important that the "facts" that you decide to give should be solidly established, - if you  find them in prominent review articles, it's a good indication that these are "established" facts - and you can use one or more reviews as references. In an encyclopedia article you would probably only describe an individual study if it was exceptionally important. An encyclopedia article is a display of breadth of knowledge more than depth. For the exam you'll need to show breadth '''and''' depth.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 16:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:50, 18 October 2009

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Long-term effects of obesity on health. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Health Sciences [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Lowri Phillips 21:00, 5 October 2009 (UTC) Amelia Sheldon 17:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC) Katherine Laura Greenall 15:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC) Rachael White 13:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Very good start, you've got a nice selection of reviews here.Gareth Leng 09:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


I agree! Just a minor point: Check the format of your references, Journal titles should be in italic and not within " " for instance.

Nicholas, I thought you wanted to work on diabetes? If so you should join the Diabesity article, if you have changed your mind let me know. Celine Caquineau 10:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


Any news form Hannah? Celine Caquineau 09:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Lowri asked me "Should I be aiming to discuss specific experiments and how they have contributed to what we know?" I answeresd "For an encyclopedia article, it's important that the "facts" that you decide to give should be solidly established, - if you find them in prominent review articles, it's a good indication that these are "established" facts - and you can use one or more reviews as references. In an encyclopedia article you would probably only describe an individual study if it was exceptionally important. An encyclopedia article is a display of breadth of knowledge more than depth. For the exam you'll need to show breadth and depth.Gareth Leng 16:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC)