Talk:Health science: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nancy Sculerati MD No edit summary |
imported>Nancy Sculerati MD No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
are you sure you want to make the distinction between healing arts and health sciences, Everything is referrrd to by "ABC science" and if this is the universal way people call things,.... | are you sure you want to make the distinction between healing arts and health sciences, Everything is referrrd to by "ABC science" and if this is the universal way people call things,.... | ||
Yes. To call traditional healing arts "health science" is an oxymoron and confuses everything, leading to articles - such as the one I edited, in which little to no real information is given. Instead, "Healing Arts" and "Health Care" articles can give Chinese Traditional Medicine and other very important healing arts their due, and "Health Science" can actually cover the Allied Health Sciences which, alone, is an enormous subject. I'm just getting started on it. Regards, [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 06:05, 2 November 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 07:05, 2 November 2006
are you sure you want to make the distinction between healing arts and health sciences, Everything is referrrd to by "ABC science" and if this is the universal way people call things,.... Yes. To call traditional healing arts "health science" is an oxymoron and confuses everything, leading to articles - such as the one I edited, in which little to no real information is given. Instead, "Healing Arts" and "Health Care" articles can give Chinese Traditional Medicine and other very important healing arts their due, and "Health Science" can actually cover the Allied Health Sciences which, alone, is an enormous subject. I'm just getting started on it. Regards, Nancy Sculerati MD 06:05, 2 November 2006 (CST)