Talk:History of political thought: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
(Talk page generated using Special:MetadataForm)
 
imported>Sandy Harris
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Questions ==
Should this be retitled "Western political thought" or some such, since it deals only with that tradition?
India and China are dismissed with: "There were significant developments in political thinking in China and India during that period, but since they had little influence on that thread, they are conventionally omitted from courses and treatises on the history of economic thought, and are usually given separate treatment elsewhere." Why is it "economic thought" here while the overall title is "political thought"? Shouldn't there at least be links to [[Confucius]] and others, even if those articles are as yet unwritten and we do not treat those topics here? [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 03:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:36, 31 May 2011

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Timelines [?]
Addendum [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The development of political ideas over time since the discovery of politics in Plato, Confucius and Mencius. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Politics, History and Philosophy [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Questions

Should this be retitled "Western political thought" or some such, since it deals only with that tradition?

India and China are dismissed with: "There were significant developments in political thinking in China and India during that period, but since they had little influence on that thread, they are conventionally omitted from courses and treatises on the history of economic thought, and are usually given separate treatment elsewhere." Why is it "economic thought" here while the overall title is "political thought"? Shouldn't there at least be links to Confucius and others, even if those articles are as yet unwritten and we do not treat those topics here? Sandy Harris 03:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC)