Talk:History of television technology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Russell Potter No edit summary |
imported>Richard Jensen (order & system) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hi Richard. Hmm, in an ordinary reference work or index, that would make sense to me, but I'd want to be sure we follow the common nomenclature first. Let's wait and see how that discussion goes, and/or join it at [[CZ Talk:Naming Conventions]]. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 04:03, 24 April 2007 (CDT) | Hi Richard. Hmm, in an ordinary reference work or index, that would make sense to me, but I'd want to be sure we follow the common nomenclature first. Let's wait and see how that discussion goes, and/or join it at [[CZ Talk:Naming Conventions]]. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 04:03, 24 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
::putting the keyword first is a matter of logic. Otherwise many different schemes are possible: "Development of Television", "American Television History," "The Story of TV News", "Trends in TV", "Major inventions in TV history" etc etc. Each editor will do it differently and CZ will be hard to use and hard to edit. Order and system (We're like Buffon--was he the classifier?) [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 06:14, 24 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 06:14, 24 April 2007
I suggest we change the name to Television, History the goal is to get the major keyword first. Richard Jensen 00:42, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
Hi Richard. Hmm, in an ordinary reference work or index, that would make sense to me, but I'd want to be sure we follow the common nomenclature first. Let's wait and see how that discussion goes, and/or join it at CZ Talk:Naming Conventions. Russell Potter 04:03, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
- putting the keyword first is a matter of logic. Otherwise many different schemes are possible: "Development of Television", "American Television History," "The Story of TV News", "Trends in TV", "Major inventions in TV history" etc etc. Each editor will do it differently and CZ will be hard to use and hard to edit. Order and system (We're like Buffon--was he the classifier?) Richard Jensen 06:14, 24 April 2007 (CDT)