Talk:Jacques Derrida: Difference between revisions
imported>John Dayton No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I've clarified that line some. I wish I had more time to write. I really just wanted to get an article for Derrida started. The concept of ''Differánce'' is intense, to say the least. With out ''Writing and Difference'' in front of me when I wrote these very very brief paragraphs, I am hesitant to put words into Derrida's mouth. - John Dayton | I've clarified that line some. I wish I had more time to write. I really just wanted to get an article for Derrida started. The concept of ''Differánce'' is intense, to say the least. With out ''Writing and Difference'' in front of me when I wrote these very very brief paragraphs, I am hesitant to put words into Derrida's mouth. - John Dayton | ||
It might be easier to write about Derrida without actually consulting him. ;-) Seriously, you're going to have to be a hell of a lot clearer than Derrida is if you want to make a readable encyclopedia article about him. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 13:00, 15 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 14:00, 15 February 2007
"on this space - the reference - from sign to sign." This statement IMHO is semantically or meaningless or relies un explained allusions. As the topic is famously obscure, surely we can do better? David Tribe 14:49, 14 February 2007 (CST)
I've clarified that line some. I wish I had more time to write. I really just wanted to get an article for Derrida started. The concept of Differánce is intense, to say the least. With out Writing and Difference in front of me when I wrote these very very brief paragraphs, I am hesitant to put words into Derrida's mouth. - John Dayton
It might be easier to write about Derrida without actually consulting him. ;-) Seriously, you're going to have to be a hell of a lot clearer than Derrida is if you want to make a readable encyclopedia article about him. --Larry Sanger 13:00, 15 February 2007 (CST)