Talk:Kamehameha I/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt
(→‎Date of birth: new section)
imported>Peter Schmitt
(→‎Related articles: new section)
Line 18: Line 18:
this should be reflected when his life dates are given. Moreover, this deserves - needs - a discussion in text  
this should be reflected when his life dates are given. Moreover, this deserves - needs - a discussion in text  
and an explanation why 1958 is chosen. (Should not his "the Great" also be mentioned?) [[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 00:10, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
and an explanation why 1958 is chosen. (Should not his "the Great" also be mentioned?) [[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 00:10, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
== Related articles ==
I have the impression that the list of "Related Articles" is too long.
Not every topic that is linked from the page is also "related" (e.g., Halley's comet).
[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 00:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:27, 12 August 2009

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition (1758?-1819) Also known as Kamehameha the Great, the first Hawaiian king. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories History, Law and Military [Editors asked to check categories]
 Subgroup category:  Politics
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Military comments

I'm delighted to have the request; the lack of collaboration has been rather frustrating. On my first cup of coffee, I made a minor link change for a submarine and will fill in the link.

My basic problem is that I don't know why and how the Hawaiians fought wars. The fact of the Law of the Splintered Paddle, to which I'll return in another context, shows there was some sophisticated thinking about what the West called jus in bello within the broader context of just war theory. Indeed, while it may not have been considered, it could well have been input into the Lieber Code, Hague Conventions, and Geneva Conventions.

Some Pacific peoples, as I understand, fought wars more for manhood rituals, exchange of women, etc. Others fought wars for conquest. Not that it's specific to this article, but why did Hawaiians decide to go to war? What were their objectives? (This also reminds me that I need to work on Fred Ikle's book, Every War Must End).

I understand that some Pacific peoples had razor-edged spears and arrows for hunting, but blunted them for war — someone might get hurt. It doesn't sound like the Hawaiians were quite this symbolic.

In other words, from a military standpoint, a record of a battle or war, especially when considering the command aspects, is more than just that an engagement took place at a certain time -- although I disagree with a former Editor that the battles themselves are less important than the context. Both are meaningful. In this article or perhaps better in another one, I need to understand more about the Hawaiian concept of war before I can really advise on the content in these areas. Howard C. Berkowitz 15:32, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Date of birth

Since the date of birth is not known (and the estimates are very different -- is 1937/38 a typo?) this should be reflected when his life dates are given. Moreover, this deserves - needs - a discussion in text and an explanation why 1958 is chosen. (Should not his "the Great" also be mentioned?) Peter Schmitt 00:10, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Related articles

I have the impression that the list of "Related Articles" is too long. Not every topic that is linked from the page is also "related" (e.g., Halley's comet). Peter Schmitt 00:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)