Talk:Logical positivism: Difference between revisions
imported>Matthias Brendel No edit summary |
imported>DavidGoodman (check) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I think this is an article, which takes a very English view of logical positivism. There is too much focus on Unified Science, Ayer, Wittgenstein, and two few details on other things. --[[User:Matthias Brendel|Matthias Brendel]] 09:35, 20 November 2006 (CST) | I think this is an article, which takes a very English view of logical positivism. There is too much focus on Unified Science, Ayer, Wittgenstein, and two few details on other things. --[[User:Matthias Brendel|Matthias Brendel]] 09:35, 20 November 2006 (CST) | ||
==checked== | |||
and of course not deleted. [[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 20:48, 18 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 21:48, 18 February 2007
Ethics
"affirmed that statements about metaphysics, religion and ethics are devoid of cognitive meaning "
Moritz Schlick: "Problems of Ethics", 1939. I doubt that we can simplify the views of the Vienna Circle about ethics this way.
--Matthias Brendel 09:17, 20 November 2006 (CST)
Logical Empiricism
As I know, the philosophy of the Vienna Circle is called Logical Positivism, while the philosophy of the Berlin Circle (Reichenbach) as logical empirism. So they are not synonims, altough almost indistinguishable. --Matthias Brendel 09:20, 20 November 2006 (CST)
Uneven article
I think this is an article, which takes a very English view of logical positivism. There is too much focus on Unified Science, Ayer, Wittgenstein, and two few details on other things. --Matthias Brendel 09:35, 20 November 2006 (CST)
checked
and of course not deleted. DavidGoodman 20:48, 18 February 2007 (CST)