Talk:Maple/Catalogs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
imported>Aleta Curry m (okey-dokey) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 15:46, 18 October 2007 (CDT) | [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 15:46, 18 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Yes, many Catalogs of.... exist, I guess we'll shepherd them all into place eventually. With respect to catalog vs catalogue I went with the shortest to more easily fit in the tab. :) [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 16:47, 18 October 2007 (CDT) | :Yes, many Catalogs of.... exist, I guess we'll shepherd them all into place eventually. With respect to catalog vs catalogue I went with the shortest to more easily fit in the tab. :) [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 16:47, 18 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Fair enough! [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 16:48, 18 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:48, 18 October 2007
Re: Catalog of maple trees moved to maple/catalog: is there any good reason not to do this?
No, there isn't. The reason catalog of... existed was that I needed to list the trees somewhere while they were on my mind and didn't see the maple/catalog subpage just at the mo. Later, I asked Matt and he found out where they were--possibly from you-:)
Anyway, this leads to a larger point: there are probably a few "catalogs of..." and "catalogues of..."--remember way back when when we were deciding whether to have lists, cats, clusters, etc. etc.? Aleta Curry 15:46, 18 October 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, many Catalogs of.... exist, I guess we'll shepherd them all into place eventually. With respect to catalog vs catalogue I went with the shortest to more easily fit in the tab. :) Chris Day (talk) 16:47, 18 October 2007 (CDT)
- Fair enough! Aleta Curry 16:48, 18 October 2007 (CDT)