Talk:Market (economics)

From Citizendium
Revision as of 02:54, 29 October 2010 by imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→‎Needs for links for political articles; at least standard terminology: new section)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A term used in commerce and economics to denote a conjunction of buyers and sellers. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Economics and Business [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Framework

I have set up a framework for an article that readers could use as an introduction to the concept and as a gateway to a range of more specialised articles. Comments and contributions are invited. Nick Gardner 09:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Needs for links for political articles; at least standard terminology

In current popular American political discourse, the "market" is thrown about as an ideal, but there are serious oversimplifications. While, all too often, the word is simply a talisman and little thought goes into its meaning, my own thought is that a "free market" is ideally a "perfect market", with the counterintuitive idea that it is usually necessary to have some independent oversight to avoid market manipulation, insider information, etc. The current financial markets deviate from classic assumption on value, and the supply and demand of real goods and services is subordinated to short-term value of (at best) common stock and probably at worst, exotic financial instruments.

Should the tragedy of the commons be here?

Howard C. Berkowitz 07:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)