Talk:Reagan Doctrine: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ro Thorpe
imported>Jonathan Beshears
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
Ro Thorpe did it. Good call. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 12:14, 17 February 2008 (CST)
Ro Thorpe did it. Good call. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 12:14, 17 February 2008 (CST)
:Thanks - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 12:29, 17 February 2008 (CST)
:Thanks - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 12:29, 17 February 2008 (CST)
==Citations==
I'm not going to pull a wikipedia and put fact tags everywhere, but I think we need more citations in the article. [[User:Jonathan Beshears|Jonathan Beshears]] 13:46, 17 February 2008 (CST)

Revision as of 14:46, 17 February 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories History and Politics [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English
To do.


Metadata here


This article, since it will be in American English (as it concerns an American topic), should be copyedited accordingly.

I also spot some neutrality issues, which I leave to the reader to find... --Larry Sanger 12:49, 6 December 2007 (CST)

Cut and change as you see fit. Denis Cavanagh 13:04, 6 December 2007 (CST)

Title

Shouldn't it be moved to Reagan Doctrine? Hayford Peirce 10:52, 17 February 2008 (CST)

Ro Thorpe did it. Good call. Denis Cavanagh 12:14, 17 February 2008 (CST)

Thanks - Ro Thorpe 12:29, 17 February 2008 (CST)

Citations

I'm not going to pull a wikipedia and put fact tags everywhere, but I think we need more citations in the article. Jonathan Beshears 13:46, 17 February 2008 (CST)