Talk:Robert A. Heinlein: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Derek Hodges
(New page: {{subpages}})
 
imported>Hayford Peirce
(What do we do about what St. RAH told me over a glass of wine about which was his best book?)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
Hey, great! About time! (I was too lazy to do it myself....)
Here's a question that was discussed (and argued) over for months at various WP forums and articles:
I added to one of the RAH articles a brief statement that Robert told me personally (while we were drinking rose wine in Tahiti) that Moon Is a Harsh Mistress was his best book.
Cries of Original Research! Hoohah to the nth degree! Some people took my side. Some didn't. It was inserted, removed, reverted, etc. etc.
At first I couldn't understand how anyone could *possibly* remove it. Finally I grew to understand the WP view of Original Research, so I shrugged my shoulders and said the hell with it.
What do we want to do about it here in this more civilized environment?[[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 15:33, 5 March 2008 (CST)

Revision as of 16:33, 5 March 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Works [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition (1907–88) American author of science fiction; wrote Stranger in a Strange Land. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Literature [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  Science fiction
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Hey, great! About time! (I was too lazy to do it myself....)

Here's a question that was discussed (and argued) over for months at various WP forums and articles:

I added to one of the RAH articles a brief statement that Robert told me personally (while we were drinking rose wine in Tahiti) that Moon Is a Harsh Mistress was his best book.

Cries of Original Research! Hoohah to the nth degree! Some people took my side. Some didn't. It was inserted, removed, reverted, etc. etc.

At first I couldn't understand how anyone could *possibly* remove it. Finally I grew to understand the WP view of Original Research, so I shrugged my shoulders and said the hell with it.

What do we want to do about it here in this more civilized environment?Hayford Peirce 15:33, 5 March 2008 (CST)