Talk:Rock 'n' roll: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce (should it be moved to Rock 'n' Roll or Rock n Roll?) |
imported>Brian Dean Abramson (I'm inclined to say it should stay here, as "rock n' roll" is just an abbreviated form which (along with rock & roll) should redirect here.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
In any case, I say it's spinach, and I say the hell with it.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 21:08, 26 September 2007 (CDT) | In any case, I say it's spinach, and I say the hell with it.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 21:08, 26 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:I'm inclined to say it should stay here, as "rock n' roll" is just an abbreviated form which (along with rock & roll) should redirect here. [[User:Brian Dean Abramson|Brian Dean Abramson]] 14:46, 27 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:46, 27 September 2007
Googling gives us 11 million hits for "rock and roll" and 15 million for "rock n roll" (same as "rock 'n' roll"). On the other hand, the museum devoted to this nasty stuff is called the "Rock and Roll Museum". Should this article be moved to "Rock n roll"?
In any case, I say it's spinach, and I say the hell with it.... Hayford Peirce 21:08, 26 September 2007 (CDT)
- I'm inclined to say it should stay here, as "rock n' roll" is just an abbreviated form which (along with rock & roll) should redirect here. Brian Dean Abramson 14:46, 27 September 2007 (CDT)