Talk:Systems biology: Difference between revisions
imported>Anthony.Sebastian m (Commitment to edit) |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I plan to update/edit this article in stages as time permits. [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 14:57, 17 December 2006 (CST) | I plan to update/edit this article in stages as time permits. [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 14:57, 17 December 2006 (CST) | ||
==Regarding Chris Day's Removal of externals links== | |||
Chris, you say you're not sure we need the external links to labs and conferences in the 'Systems Biology' article. I feel strongly that they add to the quality of the article. For example, clicking on the link to the Institute for Systems Biology provides the reader with additional depth on the goals and approaches in the discipline not contained in the CZ article, examples of application, and webcasts. CZ gains that at little cost in space or distraction. | |||
Moreover, those labs and conferences abound with experts in many fields, as systems biology operates as an interdisciplinary discipline. Whether those experts discover the CZ article linking to their sites, or we apprise them of the article (or related articles) as potentially benefitting from their expertise, CZ may have a chance of gaining their participation in the project. | |||
I would suggest a comprise: Let's leave the links in, and I will go through each one, eliminating those sites that offer the reader added-value to the main "Systems Biology' article. | |||
Thanks for considering this. | |||
[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 13:18, 19 December 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 14:18, 19 December 2006
Beginning Edit
I plan to update/edit this article in stages as time permits. Anthony.Sebastian 14:57, 17 December 2006 (CST)
Regarding Chris Day's Removal of externals links
Chris, you say you're not sure we need the external links to labs and conferences in the 'Systems Biology' article. I feel strongly that they add to the quality of the article. For example, clicking on the link to the Institute for Systems Biology provides the reader with additional depth on the goals and approaches in the discipline not contained in the CZ article, examples of application, and webcasts. CZ gains that at little cost in space or distraction.
Moreover, those labs and conferences abound with experts in many fields, as systems biology operates as an interdisciplinary discipline. Whether those experts discover the CZ article linking to their sites, or we apprise them of the article (or related articles) as potentially benefitting from their expertise, CZ may have a chance of gaining their participation in the project.
I would suggest a comprise: Let's leave the links in, and I will go through each one, eliminating those sites that offer the reader added-value to the main "Systems Biology' article.
Thanks for considering this.
Anthony.Sebastian 13:18, 19 December 2006 (CST)