Talk:Taxation: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
(→‎Deleted!: new section)
imported>D. Matt Innis
(→‎Deleted!: what we talkin bout)
Line 31: Line 31:
Who do you suppose said that?
Who do you suppose said that?
[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 07:25, 14 November 2007 (CST)
[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 07:25, 14 November 2007 (CST)
:I'm not sure, but I think he meant to discuss the edit rather than discussing discussion :-) --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 07:46, 14 November 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 08:46, 14 November 2007


Article Checklist for "Taxation"
Workgroup category or categories Economics Workgroup, Law Workgroup, Politics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Bruce M.Tindall 16:52, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Intro

"Taxation is the imposition of a transfer of money to the government." This is a poor intro for many reasons (I wrote it), not the least of which is that I can't think of a better term than "money" which seems inaccurate (taxation can exist without money, right?). Anthony 20:19, 21 January 2007 (CST)

History (basically resolved)


I would be inclined to leave the factoid in, flagged here on the Talk page, and remove the source simply because the source is inappropriate; the sourced info might be correct, though. We do, will, and arguably must have all sorts of unsourced claims.

Anyway, though, do as you like; I am writing as contributor here, not as editor. --Larry Sanger 19:46, 21 January 2007 (CST)

  • The place seems to be correct, and the date is fairly close to the beginning of recorded history anyway, so I've mentioned that rather than definitively saying it is the oldest. Anthony 20:09, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Deleted!

I was once told that I must not delete things without prior discussion - there are strict rules against he said. Who do you suppose said that? Nick Gardner 07:25, 14 November 2007 (CST)

I'm not sure, but I think he meant to discuss the edit rather than discussing discussion :-) --Matt Innis (Talk) 07:46, 14 November 2007 (CST)