Talk:Winston Churchill: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
(Please explain reverts more completely, gentlemen)
imported>Richard Jensen
(illegal to do anything)
Line 18: Line 18:


Please explain your reverts.  We have a "zero unexplained revert" rule, which means you cannot simply undo a significant amount of work by someone else (e.g., several sentences)--or re-revert, to re-include them--without an adequate explanation.  See [[CZ:Professionalism#Reversion_and_deletion_as_unprofessional_behaviors|this section of CZ:Professionalism]], please. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:17, 14 August 2007 (CDT)
Please explain your reverts.  We have a "zero unexplained revert" rule, which means you cannot simply undo a significant amount of work by someone else (e.g., several sentences)--or re-revert, to re-include them--without an adequate explanation.  See [[CZ:Professionalism#Reversion_and_deletion_as_unprofessional_behaviors|this section of CZ:Professionalism]], please. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:17, 14 August 2007 (CDT)
::we seem to have a philosophical dilemma. It is illegal to erase text but also illegal to restore it. (In this case I DID provide an explanation in the Summary line)> [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]]

Revision as of 13:42, 14 August 2007


Article Checklist for "Winston Churchill"
Workgroup category or categories History Workgroup, Politics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 13:01, 5 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Lead image

I think the article needs an image in the lead section, to show how Winston Churchill looks like. However, I have not found any copyright-free picture yet. If anyone does find such an image, please add onto the article, thanks! Yi Zhe Wu 17:38, 25 May 2007 (CDT)

Please explain reverts

Please explain your reverts. We have a "zero unexplained revert" rule, which means you cannot simply undo a significant amount of work by someone else (e.g., several sentences)--or re-revert, to re-include them--without an adequate explanation. See this section of CZ:Professionalism, please. --Larry Sanger 12:17, 14 August 2007 (CDT)

we seem to have a philosophical dilemma. It is illegal to erase text but also illegal to restore it. (In this case I DID provide an explanation in the Summary line)> Richard Jensen