U.S. Electoral College: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony Argyriou
(→‎The Electoral College Generally: doesn't need to be a separate section, s/larger/more populous/)
imported>Anthony Argyriou
(major reorganization and addition of material)
Line 3: Line 3:
Each state in the United States is granted a number of electors equal to the number of [[Representative]]s and [[Senator]]s apportioned to the state.  Since each state is granted at least one Representative and exactly two Senators, each state has at least three electoral votes.  More populous states have more Representatives and hence have more electoral votes.
Each state in the United States is granted a number of electors equal to the number of [[Representative]]s and [[Senator]]s apportioned to the state.  Since each state is granted at least one Representative and exactly two Senators, each state has at least three electoral votes.  More populous states have more Representatives and hence have more electoral votes.


==Original Electoral College==
At present, at presidential elections, each state chooses electors by popular vote, the electors of each state vote for president and separately for vice-president, and the votes are transmitted to the President of the Senate. Electors must vote for at least one person not of their own state.<ref>12th Amendment to the U.S. Consitution</ref>


In the original Constitution, the Electoral College is detailed in [[Article 2 of the United States Constitution|Article 2]]. The states appointed their electors by whatever means they desired.  Today, they are selected by election, but they can be selected by the legislature or executive.
==Hisotry of the Electoral College==
The Electoral College was devised by the framers of the Constitution as a solution to the problem of selecting a President. Early proposals were to have Congress elect the president, to have the State legislatures elect the president, or to elect the president by popular vote. Congressional election was rejected as being possibly too divisive, too easy to corrupt, and as eroding the separation of powers. State legislative election was rejected as leaving a president beholden to States who might wish to erode national authority. Popular voting was rejected because, at the time, communication between states was not very good, and there would be very few nationally known persons, and thus people would tend to vote for their state's "favorite son", making it difficult to obtain a majority. Further, small states feared that popular vote would allow a combination of large states to dominate the presidency. Eventually, a "Committee of Eleven" proposed that the President should be elected by electors from each state, similar to the way that the Pope is elected by the College of Cardinals, or the Holy Roman Emperor was elected. The structure of the Electoral College can be traced to the Centurial Assembly system of the Roman Republic.<ref name=FEC>{{cite web|last|Kimberling|first=William|title=The Electoral College|publisher=Federal Election Commission|url=http://www.fec.gov/pdf/eleccoll.pdf|date=November 1992|accessdate=2007-04-29}}</ref>


On a day specified by Congress, the electors would meet within their state and cast two ballots for President.  The only stipulations, aside from the qualifications for the office, were that at least one of the names had to be from a person not a citizen of the elector's state, and that the names on the ballots must be different. The votes would be collected and sent to the Congress.
===Original Electoral College===
The Electoral College was originally detailed in [[Article 2 of the United States Constitution|Article 2]]. On a day specified by Congress, electors would meet within their state and cast two ballots for President.  The only stipulations, aside from the qualifications for the office, were that at least one of the names had to be from a person not a citizen of the elector's state, and that the names on the ballots must be different. The votes would be collected and sent to the Congress.


The President of the Senate would open all votes in the presence of the members House of Representatives and Senate, and read all of the votes.  The person with the highest number of votes, if the number be a majority of the electors, would be elected President.  The person with the second-highest number of votes would be elected Vice President.
The President of the Senate would open all votes in the presence of the members House of Representatives and Senate, and read all of the votes.  The person with the highest number of votes, if the number be a majority of the electors, would be elected President.  The person with the second-highest number of votes would be elected Vice President.


If two persons exceeded the half-way mark, and had an equal number of votes, the members of the House of Representatives, voting as states and not individuals, would choose between the two names.  If no single name exceeded the half-way mark, the top five names would be placed before the House and the House would decide from those five; voting, again, as whole states.
If two persons exceeded the half-way mark, and had an equal number of votes, the members of the House of Representatives, voting as states and not individuals, would choose between the two names.  If no single name exceeded the half-way mark, the top five names would be placed before the House and the House would decide from those five; voting, again, as whole states. The person with the most votes would become President, and the person with the second-most votes would become Vice-President. If there was a tie for second place after the selection of the President, the Senate would choose the Vice-President between these names.  Voting in the Senate would be as individuals, not as states.


If there was a tie for second place after the selection of the President, the Senate would choose between these names. Voting in the Senate would be as individuals, not as states.
In the first two Presidential elections, in 1788 and 1792, [[George Washington]] was elected President, receiving a vote from every elector, 69 in 1788 and 132 in 1792. [[John Adams]] received 34 electoral votes in 1788 and 77 in 1792, and was elected Vice-President. [[George Clinton]] of New York received 50 votes in 1792.<ref name=results1>{{cite web|title=Historical Election Results: Electoral Votes for President and Vice President 1789-1821|publisher=U.S. National Archives and Records Administration|url=http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/votes/1789_1821.html|accessdate=2007-04-29}}</ref>


===Problems with the original scheme===
===Elections of 1796 and 1800===
Relatively quickly, problems with this electoral scheme emerged. In the election of 1796, political rivals [[John Adams]] and [[Thomas Jefferson]] obtained 71 and 68 votes, respectively, in the Electoral College vote. Adams's running mate was [[Thomas Pinckney]], who came in third with 59 votes; Jefferson's running mate was [[Aaron Burr]], who came in fourth with 30 votes.<ref name=results1 /> Though this mixing of factions (what we call political parties today) was not seen as a problem by the Framers, friction between Adams and Jefferson led to many thinking the Electoral College should be changed.


Relatively quickly, problems with this electoral scheme emerged. In the election of 1796, political rivals [[John Adams]] and [[Thomas Jefferson]] came in first and second, respectively, in the Electoral College vote. Adams's running mate was [[Thomas Pinckney]], who came in third in the vote; Jefferson's running mate was [[Aaron Burr]], who came in fourth. Though this mixing of factions (what we call political parties today) was not seen as a problem by the Framers, friction between Adams and Jefferson led to many thinking the Electoral College should be changed.
In the next election, in 1800, things got worse: Adams and Pinckney were again on one ticket, and Jefferson and Burr on the other.  This time, however, Jefferson and Burr both got 73 electoral votes, throwing the election to the House. (Adams received 64, and Pinkney 63.)<ref name=results1 /> Though Jefferson was the intended Presidential candidate, Burr supporters and Adams supporters repeatedly voted to make Burr President, resulting in repeated votes that resulted in ties.  Only back-room negotiating broke the stalemate.
 
In the next election, in 1800, things got worse: Adams and Pinckney were again on one ticket, and Jefferson and Burr on the other.  This time, however, Jefferson and Burr both got an equal number of votes, throwing the election to the House. Though Jefferson was the intended Presidential candidate, Burr supporters and Adams supporters repeatedly voted to make Burr President, resulting in repeated votes that resulted in ties.  Only back-room negotiating broke the stalemate.


The [[12th Amendment to the United States Constitution|12th Amendment]] was proposed shortly after the 1800 fiasco was settled.
The [[12th Amendment to the United States Constitution|12th Amendment]] was proposed shortly after the 1800 fiasco was settled.


==Today's Electoral College==
===12th Amendment===
 
The 12th Amendment changed the process only slightly, but the change allowed the 1800 Jefferson/Burr mess to be avoided. The 12th Amendment begins {{cquote|The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, '''and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President''',}}
The 12th Amendment changed the process only slightly, but the change allowed the 1800 Jefferson/Burr mess to be avoided.
 
The 12th Amendment still dictates that electors cast two ballots, but now one ballot is specifically for President, and one specifically for Vice President. The other rules remained in effect: one of the names had to be from a state other than the elector's, for example.
 
The name with the majority of the votes for President is named President. If there is no majority in the ballots for President, the three highest vote-getters are voted on by the House, voting as states.  The winner of that vote is President.
The name with the majority of the votes for President is named President. If there is no majority in the ballots for President, the three highest vote-getters are voted on by the House, voting as states.  The winner of that vote is President.


Line 37: Line 34:
In the first election following the ratification of the 12th Amendment, in 1804, Jefferson received 162 votes to 14 for [[Charles Pinckney]] for President; [[George Clinton]] received 162 votes to 14 for [[Rufus King]] for the office of Vice President.
In the first election following the ratification of the 12th Amendment, in 1804, Jefferson received 162 votes to 14 for [[Charles Pinckney]] for President; [[George Clinton]] received 162 votes to 14 for [[Rufus King]] for the office of Vice President.


==Other changes in the Electoral College==
===History of selection of electors===
From the outset, and to this day, the manner of choosing a State's Electors was left to each State legislature. Initially different States adopted different methods. Some State legislatures decided to choose the Electors themselves. Others decided on a direct popular vote for Electors either by Congressional district or at large throughout the whole State. Still others devised some combination of these methods. But in all cases, Electors were chosen individually from a single list of all candidates for the position.


In 1961, the [[23rd Amendment to the United States Constitution|23rd Amendment]] was ratified. The 23rd grants the national capital electoral votes as if it were a state, though it may not have more votes than the smallest stateCurrently, [[Washington D.C.]] is granted three electoral votes.
During the 1800's, two trends in the States altered and more or less standardized the manner of choosing Electors. The first trend was toward choosing Electors by the direct popular vote of the whole State (rather than by the State legislature or by the popular vote of each Congressional district). By 1836, all States except South Carolina had moved to choosing their Electors by a direct statewide popular voteSouth Carolina persisted in choosing them by the State legislature until 1860. Today, all States choose their Electors by direct statewide election except Maine (which in 1969) and Nebraska (which in 1991) changed to selecting two of its Electors by a statewide popular vote and the remainder by the popular vote in each Congressional district.<ref name=FEC /> However, since the system has been in place in both states, the result has been the same as "winner-takes-all" because the district-wide voting mirrored the state-wide voting.


==Quirks in the Electoral College==


There are two major criticisms of the Electoral College today. One has to do with rates of representation, and the other with a minority president.
===23rd Amendment===
 
In 1961, the [[23rd Amendment to the United States Constitution|23rd Amendment]] was ratified.  The 23rd grants the national capital electoral votes as if it were a state, though it may not have more votes than the state with the least number of electors. Since ratification of the 23rd Amendment, [[Washington D.C.]] has had three electoral votes.
 
==Criticisms and defenses of the Electoral College==
 
There are two major criticisms of the Electoral College today: disproportionate rates of representation, and the possibilty of a minority president.


Small states, because of their equal representation in the Senate and minimum number of Representatives, can have an unequal representation in the Electoral College.  Though the difference is minuscule on a per capita basis, it adds up when looking at millions of persons.
Small states, because of their equal representation in the Senate and minimum number of Representatives, can have an unequal representation in the Electoral College.  Though the difference is minuscule on a per capita basis, it adds up when looking at millions of persons.
Line 50: Line 53:


The result of this can lead to minority presidents. In 1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000, presidential candidates with fewer popular votes than their opponent won the electoral vote.  In several election years, most recently 1992, 1996, and 2000, the winner of the electoral vote did not win 50% of the popular vote.
The result of this can lead to minority presidents. In 1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000, presidential candidates with fewer popular votes than their opponent won the electoral vote.  In several election years, most recently 1992, 1996, and 2000, the winner of the electoral vote did not win 50% of the popular vote.
==Modern Modifications==
Most states tally the popular vote and give all of its electoral votes to the candidate with the highest popular vote total.  There is one modification to this winner-takes-all scheme currently in place.
The modification is used in [[Maine]] and [[Nebraska]]. Two electoral votes, those apportioned for the state's Senators, are given to the state-wide winner.  The others are given to the winner of each of the state's congressional districts. Maine has used this system since 1972 and Nebraska since 1996. However, since the system has been in place in both states, the result has been the same as "winner-takes-all" because the district-wide voting mirrored the state-wide voting.


One proposal put forth in California in 2006 would have that state apportion its electoral votes to the winner of the national election.  This proposal is designed to counter the minority president issue, but would only be effective if many other states apportioned their electoral votes the same way. The bill, however, was vetoed by California [[governor]] [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]].
One proposal put forth in California in 2006 would have that state apportion its electoral votes to the winner of the national election.  This proposal is designed to counter the minority president issue, but would only be effective if many other states apportioned their electoral votes the same way. The bill, however, was vetoed by California [[governor]] [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]].
Line 68: Line 65:


Mistakes in voting have also been known to happen. In 2004, one Minnesota elector voted for [[John Edwards]] on both the presidential and vice presidential ballots. And from time to time, votes go uncast - the last time was in 2000, when one Washington D.C. elector failed to cast a ballot.
Mistakes in voting have also been known to happen. In 2004, one Minnesota elector voted for [[John Edwards]] on both the presidential and vice presidential ballots. And from time to time, votes go uncast - the last time was in 2000, when one Washington D.C. elector failed to cast a ballot.
==Notes==
{{reflist}}


[[Category:CZ Live]]
[[Category:CZ Live]]
[[Category:Politics Workgroup]]
[[Category:Politics Workgroup]]

Revision as of 11:47, 29 April 2007

The Electoral College is a group of people who meet to choose the President and Vice President of the United States. The Electoral College has existed in two forms since the establishment of the Constitution.

Each state in the United States is granted a number of electors equal to the number of Representatives and Senators apportioned to the state. Since each state is granted at least one Representative and exactly two Senators, each state has at least three electoral votes. More populous states have more Representatives and hence have more electoral votes.

At present, at presidential elections, each state chooses electors by popular vote, the electors of each state vote for president and separately for vice-president, and the votes are transmitted to the President of the Senate. Electors must vote for at least one person not of their own state.[1]

Hisotry of the Electoral College

The Electoral College was devised by the framers of the Constitution as a solution to the problem of selecting a President. Early proposals were to have Congress elect the president, to have the State legislatures elect the president, or to elect the president by popular vote. Congressional election was rejected as being possibly too divisive, too easy to corrupt, and as eroding the separation of powers. State legislative election was rejected as leaving a president beholden to States who might wish to erode national authority. Popular voting was rejected because, at the time, communication between states was not very good, and there would be very few nationally known persons, and thus people would tend to vote for their state's "favorite son", making it difficult to obtain a majority. Further, small states feared that popular vote would allow a combination of large states to dominate the presidency. Eventually, a "Committee of Eleven" proposed that the President should be elected by electors from each state, similar to the way that the Pope is elected by the College of Cardinals, or the Holy Roman Emperor was elected. The structure of the Electoral College can be traced to the Centurial Assembly system of the Roman Republic.[2]

Original Electoral College

The Electoral College was originally detailed in Article 2. On a day specified by Congress, electors would meet within their state and cast two ballots for President. The only stipulations, aside from the qualifications for the office, were that at least one of the names had to be from a person not a citizen of the elector's state, and that the names on the ballots must be different. The votes would be collected and sent to the Congress.

The President of the Senate would open all votes in the presence of the members House of Representatives and Senate, and read all of the votes. The person with the highest number of votes, if the number be a majority of the electors, would be elected President. The person with the second-highest number of votes would be elected Vice President.

If two persons exceeded the half-way mark, and had an equal number of votes, the members of the House of Representatives, voting as states and not individuals, would choose between the two names. If no single name exceeded the half-way mark, the top five names would be placed before the House and the House would decide from those five; voting, again, as whole states. The person with the most votes would become President, and the person with the second-most votes would become Vice-President. If there was a tie for second place after the selection of the President, the Senate would choose the Vice-President between these names. Voting in the Senate would be as individuals, not as states.

In the first two Presidential elections, in 1788 and 1792, George Washington was elected President, receiving a vote from every elector, 69 in 1788 and 132 in 1792. John Adams received 34 electoral votes in 1788 and 77 in 1792, and was elected Vice-President. George Clinton of New York received 50 votes in 1792.[3]

Elections of 1796 and 1800

Relatively quickly, problems with this electoral scheme emerged. In the election of 1796, political rivals John Adams and Thomas Jefferson obtained 71 and 68 votes, respectively, in the Electoral College vote. Adams's running mate was Thomas Pinckney, who came in third with 59 votes; Jefferson's running mate was Aaron Burr, who came in fourth with 30 votes.[3] Though this mixing of factions (what we call political parties today) was not seen as a problem by the Framers, friction between Adams and Jefferson led to many thinking the Electoral College should be changed.

In the next election, in 1800, things got worse: Adams and Pinckney were again on one ticket, and Jefferson and Burr on the other. This time, however, Jefferson and Burr both got 73 electoral votes, throwing the election to the House. (Adams received 64, and Pinkney 63.)[3] Though Jefferson was the intended Presidential candidate, Burr supporters and Adams supporters repeatedly voted to make Burr President, resulting in repeated votes that resulted in ties. Only back-room negotiating broke the stalemate.

The 12th Amendment was proposed shortly after the 1800 fiasco was settled.

12th Amendment

The 12th Amendment changed the process only slightly, but the change allowed the 1800 Jefferson/Burr mess to be avoided. The 12th Amendment begins

The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President,

The name with the majority of the votes for President is named President. If there is no majority in the ballots for President, the three highest vote-getters are voted on by the House, voting as states. The winner of that vote is President.

The name with the majority of the votes for Vice President is named Vice President. If there is no majority in the ballots for Vice President, the two highest vote-getters are voted on by the Senate, Senators voting as individuals. The winner of that vote is Vice President.

The 12th Amendment also closed one loophole in the process: the qualifications for Vice President were explicitly made the same as those for President.

In the first election following the ratification of the 12th Amendment, in 1804, Jefferson received 162 votes to 14 for Charles Pinckney for President; George Clinton received 162 votes to 14 for Rufus King for the office of Vice President.

History of selection of electors

From the outset, and to this day, the manner of choosing a State's Electors was left to each State legislature. Initially different States adopted different methods. Some State legislatures decided to choose the Electors themselves. Others decided on a direct popular vote for Electors either by Congressional district or at large throughout the whole State. Still others devised some combination of these methods. But in all cases, Electors were chosen individually from a single list of all candidates for the position.

During the 1800's, two trends in the States altered and more or less standardized the manner of choosing Electors. The first trend was toward choosing Electors by the direct popular vote of the whole State (rather than by the State legislature or by the popular vote of each Congressional district). By 1836, all States except South Carolina had moved to choosing their Electors by a direct statewide popular vote. South Carolina persisted in choosing them by the State legislature until 1860. Today, all States choose their Electors by direct statewide election except Maine (which in 1969) and Nebraska (which in 1991) changed to selecting two of its Electors by a statewide popular vote and the remainder by the popular vote in each Congressional district.[2] However, since the system has been in place in both states, the result has been the same as "winner-takes-all" because the district-wide voting mirrored the state-wide voting.


23rd Amendment

In 1961, the 23rd Amendment was ratified. The 23rd grants the national capital electoral votes as if it were a state, though it may not have more votes than the state with the least number of electors. Since ratification of the 23rd Amendment, Washington D.C. has had three electoral votes.

Criticisms and defenses of the Electoral College

There are two major criticisms of the Electoral College today: disproportionate rates of representation, and the possibilty of a minority president.

Small states, because of their equal representation in the Senate and minimum number of Representatives, can have an unequal representation in the Electoral College. Though the difference is minuscule on a per capita basis, it adds up when looking at millions of persons.

For example, Wyoming is the smallest state in terms of population, with 493,782 persons as of the 2000 census, and three electoral votes. This gives each person in Wyoming 0.000006075 electoral votes per person (or 164,594 persons per electoral vote). California, by contrast, had 33,871,648 persons as of the 2000 census, and 55 electoral votes. This gives each person in California 0.000001623 electoral votes (or 615,848.15 persons per electoral vote), about 26% less "vote power" than each person in Wyoming.

The result of this can lead to minority presidents. In 1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000, presidential candidates with fewer popular votes than their opponent won the electoral vote. In several election years, most recently 1992, 1996, and 2000, the winner of the electoral vote did not win 50% of the popular vote.

One proposal put forth in California in 2006 would have that state apportion its electoral votes to the winner of the national election. This proposal is designed to counter the minority president issue, but would only be effective if many other states apportioned their electoral votes the same way. The bill, however, was vetoed by California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Faithless Electors

The term faithless elector is used to denote an elector who does not vote as expected. For example, if candidate A wins the popular vote in a state, that state's electors are expected to place candidate A's name on their presidential ballots.

The Constitution, however, does not dictate any such requirement for electors - it simply notes that states select electors any way they wish, and that electors then vote. Some states have civil penalties for faithless electors, but there is argument about the constitutionality of such laws.

Faithless electors are rare but not unheard of. In 1988, for example, one West Virginia elector cast his presidential ballot for Lloyd Bentsen and his vice presidential ballot for Michael Dukakis, the reverse of every other vote for the Democratic ticket. In 1976, a Washington elector cast his presidential ballot for Ronald Reagan instead of Gerald Ford.

Mistakes in voting have also been known to happen. In 2004, one Minnesota elector voted for John Edwards on both the presidential and vice presidential ballots. And from time to time, votes go uncast - the last time was in 2000, when one Washington D.C. elector failed to cast a ballot.

Notes

  1. 12th Amendment to the U.S. Consitution
  2. 2.0 2.1 The Electoral College. Federal Election Commission (November 1992). Retrieved on 2007-04-29.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Historical Election Results: Electoral Votes for President and Vice President 1789-1821. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved on 2007-04-29.