Number needed to treat

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium

Jump to: navigation, search

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Talk
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
 
This is a draft article, under development and not meant to be cited but you can help to improve it. These unapproved articles are subject to a disclaimer.

The number needed to treat (NNT) is a way of summarizing the benefit of an intervention to improve health care.[1][2] The NNT has been proposed to improve quantitative literacy.[1] The calculations are derived from the results of a randomized controlled trial of an intervention.

Two-by-two table for a screening program
Outcome
Present Absent
Experimental (intervention) group Cell A Cell BTotal in experimental group
Control group Cell C Cell DTotal in control group
Total with outcome Total without outcome

Contents

Calculations

Event rates

\mbox{Experimental event rate}=\left (\frac{\mbox{Cell A}}{\mbox{Cell A + Cell B}}\right )
\mbox{Control event rate}=\left (\frac{\mbox{Cell C}}{\mbox{Cell C + Cell D}}\right )

Measures of efficacy

\mbox{Absolute risk reduction} =\left (\mbox{Experimental event rate} - \mbox{Control event rate}\right )
\mbox{Number need to treat}=\left (\frac{100}{\mbox{Absolute risk reduction}}\right )

Deriving the NNT from the odds or risk ratios

The odds ratio may be used to derive the number needed to treat:[3][4]

For odds ratios less than 1:[4]

NNT = \frac{1 - CER * (1 - OR)}{CER * (1 - OR)* (1 - CER)} \mbox{, where CER is control event rate and OR is odds ratio}

For odds ratios greater than 1:[4]

NNT = \frac{1 + CER * (OR - 1)}{CER * (OR - 1)* (1 - CER)} \mbox{, where CER is control event rate and OR is odds ratio}

The relative risk ratio may be used to derive the number needed to treat:[3][5]

NNT = \frac{1}{CER * (1-RRR)} \mbox{, where CER is control event rate and RRR is relative risk ratio}

The relative risk reduction may be used to derive the number needed to treat:[3][5]

NNT = \frac{1}{CER * (RRR)} \mbox{, where CER is control event rate and RRR is relative risk reduction}

Example

Variations

Years-needed-to-treat to add 1 year of life is proposed to estimate treatment effects.[6]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Laupacis A, Sackett DL, Roberts RS (1988). "An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment". N. Engl. J. Med. 318 (26): 1728–33. PMID 3374545.
  2. Wen L, Badgett R, Cornell J (2005). Number needed to treat: a descriptor for weighing therapeutic options. Am J Health Syst Pharm 62 (19): 2031–6. DOI:10.2146/ajhp040558. PMID 16174840.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Furukawa TA, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE (February 2002). Can we individualize the 'number needed to treat'? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses. Int J Epidemiol 31 (1): 72–6. PMID 11914297.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 McQuay HJ, Moore RA (May 1997). Using numerical results from systematic reviews in clinical practice. Ann. Intern. Med. 126 (9): 712–20. PMID 9139558.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Chatellier G, Zapletal E, Lemaitre D, Menard J, Degoulet P (February 1996). The number needed to treat: a clinically useful nomogram in its proper context. BMJ 312 (7028): 426–9. PMID 8601116. PMC 2350093.
  6. Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, et al. (March 2009). Years-needed-to-treat to add 1 year of life: a new metric to estimate treatment effects in randomized trials. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 11 (3): 256–63. DOI:10.1093/eurjhf/hfn048. PMID 19164422.

See also

External links

Tables of NNTs for various treatments:

Views
Personal tools