Talk:Michael Faraday/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
imported>Paul Wormer
(→‎Finished: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
I shake my fists at his cage when I have no cell reception in buildings. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 11:15, 31 March 2008 (CDT)
I shake my fists at his cage when I have no cell reception in buildings. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 11:15, 31 March 2008 (CDT)
== Finished ==
As far as I'm concerned this article is finished. If you compare it with the WP article you will find that certain facts are missing in the present article:
* the clathrate hydrate of chlorine, bunsen burner and the system of oxidation numbers.
* Outhgill in Westmorland
* George Riebau, John Tatum, William Dance, John Payne, Jane Apreece, John 'Mad Jack' Fuller, Joseph Henry, Francesco Zantedeschi
* Diffusion of gases
* Nanoparticles
* Lighthouses, corrosion and environmental science
* and more ...
The reasons that I did not mention them are:
* Do not overload with trivia. (For instance Riebau and Apreece have a WP article that says nothing more than that they played a role in Faraday's life).
* Doubt whether fact is correct (nanoparticles, environmental science, very fashionable topics, but none of my sources other than WP mentions them). I have doubts about oxidation numbers, these date from the 20th century. If Faraday had a concept like it, it needs lost of qualification and explanation.
* Is Outhgill in Yorkshire? (I saw two editions of Brittanica, both state that Faraday sr. came from Yorkshire, but fact is too unimportant to check).
* Unimportant part of Faraday's work (this point is debatable). E.g., my sources do not mention his lighthouse work, or only in passing. Same for bunsen burner.
I won't bother to give a similar list of facts that are in the present article and not in WP. If somebody will be good enough to remove my non-native-English awkwardnesses (or errors), I'll appreciate that. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 11:30, 18 April 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 11:30, 18 April 2008

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Works [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition (1791 – 1867) Was an English physicist and chemist whose best known work was on the closely connected phenomena of electricity and magnetism; his discoveries lead to the electrification of industrial societies. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Physics, History and Chemistry [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

I shake my fists at his cage when I have no cell reception in buildings. --Robert W King 11:15, 31 March 2008 (CDT)

Finished

As far as I'm concerned this article is finished. If you compare it with the WP article you will find that certain facts are missing in the present article:

  • the clathrate hydrate of chlorine, bunsen burner and the system of oxidation numbers.
  • Outhgill in Westmorland
  • George Riebau, John Tatum, William Dance, John Payne, Jane Apreece, John 'Mad Jack' Fuller, Joseph Henry, Francesco Zantedeschi
  • Diffusion of gases
  • Nanoparticles
  • Lighthouses, corrosion and environmental science
  • and more ...

The reasons that I did not mention them are:

  • Do not overload with trivia. (For instance Riebau and Apreece have a WP article that says nothing more than that they played a role in Faraday's life).
  • Doubt whether fact is correct (nanoparticles, environmental science, very fashionable topics, but none of my sources other than WP mentions them). I have doubts about oxidation numbers, these date from the 20th century. If Faraday had a concept like it, it needs lost of qualification and explanation.
  • Is Outhgill in Yorkshire? (I saw two editions of Brittanica, both state that Faraday sr. came from Yorkshire, but fact is too unimportant to check).
  • Unimportant part of Faraday's work (this point is debatable). E.g., my sources do not mention his lighthouse work, or only in passing. Same for bunsen burner.

I won't bother to give a similar list of facts that are in the present article and not in WP. If somebody will be good enough to remove my non-native-English awkwardnesses (or errors), I'll appreciate that. --Paul Wormer 11:30, 18 April 2008 (CDT)