Talk:Ham (food)

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Food Science [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English
To do.


Metadata here


Move

I think that by default we think of the meat first and foremost. I recommend moving this to Ham. John Stephenson 22:07, 26 September 2007 (CDT)

Well, in principle I agree. But I've seen a gazillion articles at WP that have been moved around and back and forth and disambig. pages etc. I just thought it would be safer to do it this way, even if it appears to be overkill at the moment. Let's get some other opinions on this before anything is done.... Hayford Peirce 22:21, 26 September 2007 (CDT)
Yes, I doubt that many people will be looking for bad actors and biblical chimpanzees. Do we have a policy on disambiguation pages? Do we need them in all cases?--Martin Baldwin-Edwards 20:59, 27 September 2007 (CDT)
I dunno if there's a policy or not. It's true that sometimes the heading for one at the top of an article looks intrusive. On the other hand, the WP page for ham lists about a dozen more possibilities. I think it's wiser to err on the side of caution and keep it.

Image talk

Wow! Makes me wish I lived in Europe! Hayford Peirce 19:13, 27 September 2007 (CDT)
The Spanish hams, I understand, are phenomenal.  —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 20:53, 27 September 2007 (CDT)
So I've been reading lately. In Tahiti I used to eat a lot of prosciutto and somewhat less Bayonne, which I never liked as much as the prosciutto. But I probably wasn't getting really top-grade Bayonne.